D.P.P. v. B.J.N. Construction Ltd. [2003] IEHC 16 (25 June 2003)

D.P.P. v. B.J.N. Construction Ltd. [2003] IEHC 16 (25 June 2003)

The statutory time limits for instituting proceedings under section 51 of the Safety Health and Welfare at Work Act, 1989, as amended, apply only to summary offences and not to indictable offences. The District Judge erred in striking out the summonses for indictable offences on the basis of non-compliance with those time limits.

Citation
[2003] IEHC 16
Parties
Prosecutor/appellant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused/respondent: B. J. N. Construction Limited; Accused/respondent: Brendan Mooney
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
25 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Case Stated (appeal From District Court) / High Court Judgment on Case Stated
Outcome
District Judge's decision reversed; summonses should not have been struck out for failure to comply with time limits.
Legal Topics
Time Limits for Prosecution, Summary Vs. Indictable Offences, Interpretation of Penal Statutes, Occupational Safety Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Prosecutor/appellant

B. J. N. Construction Limited

Accused/respondent

Brendan Mooney

Accused/respondent

Procedural Posture

Case Stated (appeal From District Court) / High Court Judgment on Case Stated

  1. 1 Whether statutory time limits for instituting proceedings apply to indictable offences as well as summary offences under the Safety Health and Welfare at Work Act, 1989 and related legislation.
  2. 2 Whether the District Judge was correct in striking out the summonses for failure to comply with time limits.

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory time limits for instituting proceedings under section 51 of the Safety Health and Welfare at Work Act, 1989, as amended, apply only to summary offences and not to indictable offences. The District Judge erred in striking out the summonses for indictable offences on the basis of non-compliance with those time limits.

Court Disposition

District Judge's decision reversed; summonses should not have been struck out for failure to comply with time limits.

Orders

  • The case is remitted to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this judgment.