Proctor and Gamble Co. v. Controller of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2003] IESC 35 (4 June 2003)
The statutory three-month time limit for appeal under s. 79 of the Trade Marks Act, 1996 is absolute and cannot be extended by rules of court; the appeal period commences from the date of the Controller's decision, not the date written grounds are furnished.
- Citation
- [2003] IESC 35
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Respondent: The Proctor and Gamble Company; Defendant / Appellant: The Controller of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Controller's Decision Under Trade Marks Act, 1996 / Supreme Court Judgment on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Appeals, Statutory Interpretation, Time Limits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Proctor and Gamble Company
Plaintiff / Respondent
The Controller of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
Defendant / Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Controller's Decision Under Trade Marks Act, 1996 / Supreme Court Judgment on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory three-month time limit for appeal under s. 79 of the Trade Marks Act, 1996 can be extended by rules of court
- 2 Whether the appeal period commences from the date of the Controller's decision or the date written grounds are furnished
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory three-month time limit for appeal under s. 79 of the Trade Marks Act, 1996 is absolute and cannot be extended by rules of court; the appeal period commences from the date of the Controller's decision, not the date written grounds are furnished.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; clarification provided that the statutory three-month time limit for appeal is absolute and commences from the date of the Controller's decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment