Fitzpatrick v Board of Management of St Mary's Touraneena National School and anor [2013] IESC 62 (19 December 2013)
The Board acted intra vires and bona fide in invoking clause 7.3 of Primary Circular 10/05; the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof; no breach of natural justice or fair procedures occurred; the appeal is moot regarding medical assessments as events overtook the proceedings.
- Citation
- [2013] IESC 62
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Kathleen Fitzpatrick; First Respondent: Board of Management of St Mary's Touraneena National School; Second Respondent: Minister for Education and Science
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Natural Justice, Fair Procedures, Judicial Review, Employment Contract, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Applicant/appellant
Board of Management of St Mary's Touraneena National School
First Respondent
Minister for Education and Science
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board acted ultra vires in referring the appellant for independent medical assessment under clause 7.3 of Primary Circular 10/05
- 2 Whether the Board breached principles of natural and constitutional justice
- 3 Whether the Board's invocation of clause 7.3 was irrational or motivated by improper purpose
Ratio Decidendi
The Board acted intra vires and bona fide in invoking clause 7.3 of Primary Circular 10/05; the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof; no breach of natural justice or fair procedures occurred; the appeal is moot regarding medical assessments as events overtook the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment affirmed
Orders
- Application for judicial review refused
- Appellant to pay costs to Board and Minister
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment