Muldoon & Ors v The Minister for Environment & Local Government & Ors (Approved) [2023] IECA 61 (16 March 2023)
The Court held that the Minister had statutory power under s.82 of the Road Traffic Act 1961 to regulate and limit the number of taxi licences, including delegating such power to local authorities. The regulatory regime was not ultra vires. No actionable legitimate expectation arose to the maintenance of the secondary market or licence values. The plaintiffs' claims for damages failed as they were based on the consequences of valid legislation, and were in any event statute barred due to inordinate and inexcusable delay. No breach of constitutional rights or actionable duty was established.
- Citation
- [2023] IECA 61
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Alphonsus Muldoon; Appellant/plaintiff: Mary Kelly as administrator ad litem of the estate of Thomas Kelly deceased; Appellant/plaintiff: Vincent Malone; Respondent/defendant: The Minister for the Environment and Local Government; Respondent/defendant: Ireland and the Attorney General; Respondent/defendant: Dublin City Council; Respondent/defendant: Clare City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Legitimate Expectation, Statutory Interpretation, Negligence, Breach of Statutory Duty, Property Rights, Unjust Enrichment, Misfeasance in Public Office, Delay and Statute of Limitations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alphonsus Muldoon
Appellant/plaintiff
Mary Kelly as administrator ad litem of the estate of Thomas Kelly deceased
Appellant/plaintiff
Vincent Malone
Appellant/plaintiff
The Minister for the Environment and Local Government
Respondent/defendant
Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondent/defendant
Dublin City Council
Respondent/defendant
Clare City Council
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the regulatory regime for taxi licensing between 1978 and 2000 was unlawful or ultra vires
- 2 Whether the Minister had power to impose quantitative restrictions or delegate such power to local authorities
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs had a legitimate expectation regarding the value or transferability of taxi licences
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the Minister had statutory power under s.82 of the Road Traffic Act 1961 to regulate and limit the number of taxi licences, including delegating such power to local authorities. The regulatory regime was not ultra vires. No actionable legitimate expectation arose to the maintenance of the secondary market or licence values. The plaintiffs' claims for damages failed as they were based on the consequences of valid legislation, and were in any event statute barred due to inordinate and inexcusable delay. No breach of constitutional rights or actionable duty was established.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- No order as to costs specified in the judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment