Reid & Anor v Health Service Executive [2016] IESC 8 (03 March 2016)
The contract, as revised in 1999 and acknowledged by the Irish Dental Association, expressly permitted the Health Service Executive to take whatever measures were necessary to live within budget and statutory obligations. The dentists, by operating under the contract for years, were bound by its terms, including the unilateral variation clause. The HSE's restriction of treatments to emergencies was within its contractual rights, and there was no breach of contract.
- Citation
- [2016] IESC 8
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Martin Reid; Plaintiff/appellant: James Turner; Defendant/respondent: Health Service Executive
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unilateral Variation of Contract, Collective Agreements, Statutory Interpretation, Public Service Contracts, Budgetary Constraints in Public Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Reid
Plaintiff/appellant
James Turner
Plaintiff/appellant
Health Service Executive
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Health Service Executive was entitled to unilaterally alter the terms of the dental contract to restrict reimbursement to emergency treatments only due to budgetary constraints.
- 2 Whether the 1999 revision of the contract, negotiated collectively, was binding on the individual dentists.
- 3 Whether the contract permitted unilateral variation by the Health Service Executive.
Ratio Decidendi
The contract, as revised in 1999 and acknowledged by the Irish Dental Association, expressly permitted the Health Service Executive to take whatever measures were necessary to live within budget and statutory obligations. The dentists, by operating under the contract for years, were bound by its terms, including the unilateral variation clause. The HSE's restriction of treatments to emergencies was within its contractual rights, and there was no breach of contract.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- High Court judgment affirmed
- Plaintiffs' action dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment