D.P.P. (McTiernan) v. Bradley [1999] IEHC 54; [2000] 1 IR 420 (9th December, 1999)
A District Court judge may dismiss a charge where the accused's constitutional rights have been violated in the process of bringing him before the court, but only if the violation amounts to a deliberate and conscious breach as in Trimbole's case; otherwise, the jurisdiction of the court is unaffected by the manner in which the accused was brought before it.
- Citation
- [1999] IEHC 54
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Des McTiernan); Accused: Alan Bradley; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Consultative Case Stated / High Court Review of District Court Question
- Outcome
- Qualified affirmative to District Court's question
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Arrest, Jurisdiction of District Court, Constitutional Rights, Due Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Des McTiernan)
Prosecutor
Alan Bradley
Accused
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Consultative Case Stated / High Court Review of District Court Question
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a District Court judge may dismiss a charge where the accused's constitutional right to liberty was violated in the process of bringing him before the court, when proof of a valid arrest is not an essential ingredient of the charge
Ratio Decidendi
A District Court judge may dismiss a charge where the accused's constitutional rights have been violated in the process of bringing him before the court, but only if the violation amounts to a deliberate and conscious breach as in Trimbole's case; otherwise, the jurisdiction of the court is unaffected by the manner in which the accused was brought before it.
Court Disposition
Qualified affirmative to District Court's question
Orders
- District Court judge may dismiss the charge only if evidence shows a deliberate and conscious violation of constitutional rights; otherwise, jurisdiction is unaffected by illegal process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment