JJ, In the matter of (Approved) (Rev1) [2021] IESC 1 (22 January 2021)

JJ, In the matter of (Approved) (Rev1) [2021] IESC 1 (22 January 2021)

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's orders permitting the Hospital to provide palliative care and withhold invasive life-prolonging treatment in the event of a further crisis, finding that the best interests of the child were paramount and that compelling reasons existed to override parental wishes. The evidence established that further invasive treatment would only prolong suffering without hope of recovery, and the orders did not amount to euthanasia but were consistent with constitutional and legal principles.

Citation
[2021] IESC 1
Parties
Minor/ward: J.J.; Appellant/parent: Mother of J.J.; Appellant/parent: Father of J.J.; Respondent/applicant: The Hospital; Guardian Ad Litem: Niall McGrath; Notice Party: Attorney General; Notice Party: Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC)
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
22 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Wardship/medical Treatment Supreme Court Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision Granting Orders to Permit Palliative Care and Withhold Invasive Life Prolonging Treatment for a Minor Ward
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court orders affirmed.
Legal Topics
Wardship Jurisdiction, Best Interests of the Child, Withdrawal/withholding of Life Sustaining Treatment, Parental Rights Vs. Child's Rights, Palliative Care, Euthanasia Prohibition, State Intervention in Family, Objective Test for Parental Failure
Constitutional Law Medical Law Family Law Child Law Wardship Jurisdiction Best Interests of the Child Withdrawal/withholding of Life Sustaining Treatment Parental Rights Vs. Child's Rights +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J.J.

Minor/ward

Mother of J.J.

Appellant/parent

Father of J.J.

Appellant/parent

The Hospital

Respondent/applicant

Niall McGrath

Guardian Ad Litem

Attorney General

Notice Party

Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC)

Notice Party

Procedural Posture

Wardship/medical Treatment Supreme Court Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision Granting Orders to Permit Palliative Care and Withhold Invasive Life Prolonging Treatment for a Minor Ward

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court was correct to grant orders permitting palliative care and withholding of invasive life-prolonging treatment for a minor against parental wishes
  2. 2 Whether the exercise of wardship jurisdiction and State intervention was justified under the Constitution
  3. 3 Whether the orders sought amounted to impermissible euthanasia

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's orders permitting the Hospital to provide palliative care and withhold invasive life-prolonging treatment in the event of a further crisis, finding that the best interests of the child were paramount and that compelling reasons existed to override parental wishes. The evidence established that further invasive treatment would only prolong suffering without hope of recovery, and the orders did not amount to euthanasia but were consistent with constitutional and legal principles.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court orders affirmed.

Orders

  • Hospital permitted to provide palliative care and administer medication to alleviate suffering, even if this may have a secondary effect on respiratory function.
  • Hospital permitted to withhold specified invasive life-prolonging treatments (e.g., intubation, mechanical ventilation, CPR, inotropes, ICU readmission) if not in the child's best interests.