Quigley -v- Complex Tooling & Moulding Ltd [2008] IESC 44 (22 July 2008)
The plaintiff failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that his psychiatric injury (depression) was caused by workplace bullying, as the medical evidence linked his depression to his dismissal and subsequent proceedings, not to the alleged harassment during employment.
- Citation
- [2008] IESC 44
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Respondent: Matt Quigley; Defendant / Appellant: Complex Tooling and Moulding Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; plaintiff's claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Workplace Bullying, Psychiatric Injury, Duty of Care, Causation, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matt Quigley
Plaintiff / Respondent
Complex Tooling and Moulding Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff suffered psychiatric injury as a result of workplace bullying by the defendant
- 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence of a causal link between the alleged bullying and the plaintiff's depression
- 3 Whether the quantum of damages awarded was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that his psychiatric injury (depression) was caused by workplace bullying, as the medical evidence linked his depression to his dismissal and subsequent proceedings, not to the alleged harassment during employment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; plaintiff's claim dismissed.
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed
- High Court order awarding damages set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment