Grant -v- Roche Products [2008] IESC 35 (07 May 2008)

Grant -v- Roche Products [2008] IESC 35 (07 May 2008)

The Supreme Court held that the determination of liability in wrongful death proceedings confers a tangible benefit beyond damages, serving to vindicate constitutional rights. The plaintiff's claim was not clearly unsustainable or bound to fail, and the existence of justiciable issues, including recoverability of investigative expenses, precluded striking out the proceedings. The defendants' offer of statutory damages without admission of liability did not render the proceedings pointless or abusive.

Citation
[2008] IESC 35
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Liam Grant; First Defendant: Roche Products (Ireland) Limited; Second Defendant: F. Hoffman-La Roche Limited; Third Defendant: Roche Holdings Limited; Fourth Defendant: R. P. Scherer Limited; Fifth Defendant: Roche Products Limited; Sixth Defendant: The Irish Medicine Board; Seventh Defendant: Gillian Murphy
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
07 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Interlocutory Motion to Stay Proceedings
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed
Legal Topics
Wrongful Death, Abuse of Process, Right of Access to Courts, Vindication of Personal Rights, Special Damages
Tort Law Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Wrongful Death Abuse of Process Right of Access to Courts Vindication of Personal Rights Special Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Liam Grant

Plaintiff/respondent

Roche Products (Ireland) Limited

First Defendant

F. Hoffman-La Roche Limited

Second Defendant

Roche Holdings Limited

Third Defendant

R. P. Scherer Limited

Fourth Defendant

Roche Products Limited

Fifth Defendant

The Irish Medicine Board

Sixth Defendant

Gillian Murphy

Seventh Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Interlocutory Motion to Stay Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether civil proceedings for wrongful death can be stayed when defendants offer full statutory damages without admission of liability
  2. 2 Whether determination of liability confers a tangible benefit beyond damages
  3. 3 Whether plaintiff's investigative expenses are recoverable as special damages

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the determination of liability in wrongful death proceedings confers a tangible benefit beyond damages, serving to vindicate constitutional rights. The plaintiff's claim was not clearly unsustainable or bound to fail, and the existence of justiciable issues, including recoverability of investigative expenses, precluded striking out the proceedings. The defendants' offer of statutory damages without admission of liability did not render the proceedings pointless or abusive.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed

Orders

  • Proceedings not stayed; plaintiff permitted to continue action
  • Defendants' application to stay proceedings refused