A v Minister for Justice & Ors, B v International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Ors (Approved) (Rev1) [2024] IEHC 183 (22 March 2024)
The Minister's designation of the UK as a safe third country under s.72A of the International Protection Act 2015 is lawful and not ultra vires the Procedures Directive; the review obligation has been complied with; the risk of removal to Rwanda does not render the designation unlawful given current suspension of transfers and lack of evidence applicants would be affected; data protection safeguards are adequate and any breach does not invalidate the return system; the Minister's assessment of refoulement risk was rational; applicants' standing regarding Rwanda Policy is not established; lack of candour by Applicant A does not disentitle him to relief in the circumstances.
- Citation
- [2024] IEHC 183
- Parties
- Applicant: A; Respondents: Minister for Justice, Ireland and the Attorney General; Applicant: B; Respondents: International Protection Appeals Tribunal, Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications for judicial review refused
- Legal Topics
- Safe Third Country Designation, Non Refoulement, Rwanda Policy, Data Protection, International Protection, Procedures Directive, Common European Asylum System
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant
Minister for Justice, Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
B
Applicant
International Protection Appeals Tribunal, Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Lawfulness of UK designation as safe third country under Irish law and EU law
- 2 Compliance of Irish safe third country regime with EU Procedures Directive
- 3 Obligation to review safe third country designation
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister's designation of the UK as a safe third country under s.72A of the International Protection Act 2015 is lawful and not ultra vires the Procedures Directive; the review obligation has been complied with; the risk of removal to Rwanda does not render the designation unlawful given current suspension of transfers and lack of evidence applicants would be affected; data protection safeguards are adequate and any breach does not invalidate the return system; the Minister's assessment of refoulement risk was rational; applicants' standing regarding Rwanda Policy is not established; lack of candour by Applicant A does not disentitle him to relief in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Applications for judicial review refused
Orders
- Return orders to UK affirmed
- No relief granted for alleged data protection breaches
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment