A. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Anor [2011] IEHC 389 (12 October 2011)
The Tribunal member was entitled to conclude, based on the applicant's account and country of origin information, that State protection and internal relocation were reasonably available, and the applicant had not established a well-founded fear of persecution; no substantial ground was raised to warrant leave for judicial review.
- Citation
- [2011] IEHC 389
- Parties
- Applicant: A. A.; Respondent: Refugee Appeals Tribunal; Respondent: The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Leave
- Outcome
- Application for leave refused
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, State Protection, Internal Relocation, Persecution, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. A.
Applicant
Refugee Appeals Tribunal
Respondent
The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant established a well-founded fear of persecution under the Refugee Act 1996
- 2 Whether State protection and internal relocation were reasonably available to the applicant
- 3 Whether the Tribunal applied the correct legal test for State protection
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal member was entitled to conclude, based on the applicant's account and country of origin information, that State protection and internal relocation were reasonably available, and the applicant had not established a well-founded fear of persecution; no substantial ground was raised to warrant leave for judicial review.
Court Disposition
Application for leave refused
Orders
- Leave to seek judicial review is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment