A.B -v- C.D [2013] IEHC 638 (21 June 2013)
The evidence does not meet the standard of proof required to substantiate the allegations of sexual abuse. Both parties have engaged in behaviour detrimental to the children, but neither is fit for sole custody. The welfare of the children requires a fresh start with joint custody and phased access arrangements, supported by expert assistance.
- Citation
- [2013] IEHC 638
- Parties
- Applicant: A. B.; Respondent: C. D.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Guardianship/custody Application / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- joint custody granted; access to be phased in per parenting programme
- Legal Topics
- Guardianship of Infants, Custody, Access, Child Welfare, Parental Alienation, Allegations of Abuse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. B.
Applicant
C. D.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Guardianship/custody Application / Final Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sole or joint custody should be granted to either parent
- 2 Whether access should be regulated and in what manner
- 3 Whether allegations of sexual abuse and parental alienation are substantiated and relevant to custody
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence does not meet the standard of proof required to substantiate the allegations of sexual abuse. Both parties have engaged in behaviour detrimental to the children, but neither is fit for sole custody. The welfare of the children requires a fresh start with joint custody and phased access arrangements, supported by expert assistance.
Court Disposition
joint custody granted; access to be phased in per parenting programme
Orders
- Joint custody of the children to both parties
- Access to the applicant to be developed in accordance with a parenting programme
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment