A.D. & ors -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal [2015] IEHC 779 (24 November 2015)

A.D. & ors -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal [2015] IEHC 779 (24 November 2015)

The Tribunal Member did not err in upholding the refusal of refugee status as the applicant was able to articulate her case, no independent claim was advanced for the minor applicants, the Tribunal's findings on credibility and Convention nexus were reasonable, and there was no procedural unfairness or failure to apply the relevant legal standards or guidelines.

Citation
[2015] IEHC 779
Parties
Applicant: A. D.; Applicant: R. D. (A Minor suing by her mother and next friend A. D.); Applicant: E. D. (A Minor suing by his mother and next friend A. D.); Respondent: Refugee Appeals Tribunal; Respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent: Ireland and the Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
24 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Leave
Outcome
Application for leave denied
Legal Topics
Asylum, Refugee Status Determination, Procedural Fairness, Credibility Assessment, Convention Grounds, Best Interests of the Child
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Asylum Refugee Status Determination Procedural Fairness Credibility Assessment Convention Grounds +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A. D.

Applicant

R. D. (A Minor suing by her mother and next friend A. D.)

Applicant

E. D. (A Minor suing by his mother and next friend A. D.)

Applicant

Refugee Appeals Tribunal

Respondent

The Minister for Justice and Equality

Respondent

Ireland and the Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Leave

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Appeals Tribunal erred in upholding the refusal of refugee status to the applicants
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to apply the correct standard of 'extreme care' in a papers-only appeal involving a mentally ill applicant and minor children
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to give independent consideration to the minor applicants' claims

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal Member did not err in upholding the refusal of refugee status as the applicant was able to articulate her case, no independent claim was advanced for the minor applicants, the Tribunal's findings on credibility and Convention nexus were reasonable, and there was no procedural unfairness or failure to apply the relevant legal standards or guidelines.

Court Disposition

Application for leave denied

Orders

  • Relief sought in the Notice of Motion is denied