A.Q. (Pakistan) v The Minister for Justice and Equality & ors (Approved) [2018] IEHC 276 (19 April 2018)
The decision to refuse subsidiary protection and make a deportation order was valid as it was based on findings that the applicant was not credible, was not at risk of harm, and had state protection available; any alleged error in internal relocation analysis or failure to address past persecution was not material to the outcome.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 276
- Parties
- Applicant: A. Q. (Pakistan); Respondents: The Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Subsidiary Protection, Deportation Order, Internal Relocation, Credibility Assessment, Past Persecution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. Q. (Pakistan)
Applicant
The Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subsidiary protection refusal and deportation order were lawful
- 2 Whether the internal relocation analysis was adequate
- 3 Whether the decision failed to address past persecution appropriately
Ratio Decidendi
The decision to refuse subsidiary protection and make a deportation order was valid as it was based on findings that the applicant was not credible, was not at risk of harm, and had state protection available; any alleged error in internal relocation analysis or failure to address past persecution was not material to the outcome.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for certiorari of subsidiary protection refusal and deportation order is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment