A.S. -v- S.S. [2016] IEHC 457 (29 July 2016)
The Court found the respondent's evidence and her brother's testimony credible, and determined that the applicant's conduct, including the deed and email, amounted to clear and unequivocal consent for the removal of the children to Ireland. Therefore, the removal was not wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention and the order for return was refused.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 457
- Parties
- Applicant: A. S.; Respondent: S. S.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Application Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for return of children to Germany refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Consent Under Hague Convention, Habitual Residence, Custody Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. S.
Applicant
S. S.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Application Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the removal of the children from Germany was wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the applicant consented to the removal of the children to Ireland
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the respondent's evidence and her brother's testimony credible, and determined that the applicant's conduct, including the deed and email, amounted to clear and unequivocal consent for the removal of the children to Ireland. Therefore, the removal was not wrongful under Article 3 of the Hague Convention and the order for return was refused.
Court Disposition
Order for return of children to Germany refused
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment