A v B (Approved) [2021] IEHC 352 (11 May 2021)
Order 31, rule 29 RSC is mandatory in requiring the party seeking non-party discovery to indemnify the non-party for all reasonably incurred costs, regardless of whether the privilege issue is of public importance.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 352
- Parties
- Applicant: A; Respondent: B; Non Party Applicant for Costs: Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law (judicial Separation, Guardianship, Discovery) / Post Judgment Costs Application by Non Party
- Outcome
- Order for costs in favour of the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána as non-party; costs to be borne 75% by Mr A and 25% by Ms B.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Separation, Guardianship of Infants, Non Party Discovery, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant
B
Respondent
Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
Non Party Applicant for Costs
Procedural Posture
Family Law (judicial Separation, Guardianship, Discovery) / Post Judgment Costs Application by Non Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána, as a non-party subject to a discovery order, is entitled to costs under O.31, r.29 RSC
- 2 Whether the public interest (investigative) privilege asserted by the Commissioner affects the costs order
- 3 Whether the mandatory indemnity for non-party discovery costs applies even where the privilege issue is of public importance
Ratio Decidendi
Order 31, rule 29 RSC is mandatory in requiring the party seeking non-party discovery to indemnify the non-party for all reasonably incurred costs, regardless of whether the privilege issue is of public importance.
Court Disposition
Order for costs in favour of the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána as non-party; costs to be borne 75% by Mr A and 25% by Ms B.
Orders
- Order vacating all previous orders relating to disclosure and non-party discovery.
- Order for costs in favour of the Commissioner for the initial motion, compliance with the order of 15th February, assertion and hearing of privilege, and stay application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment