In the Matter of Michael McDaid & in the Matter of Charles McDaid (Approved) [2021] IEHC 293 (05 May 2021)
The statutory criteria for adjudication in bankruptcy under s. 11(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1988 were satisfied, the debtors failed to show any legally cognisable ground to the contrary, and there was no basis for recusal; therefore, the court was required to adjudicate the debtors bankrupt.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 293
- Parties
- Petitioner Creditor: David McLaughlin; Debtor Respondent: Michael McDaid; Debtor Respondent: Charles McDaid
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment on Petition and Recusal Application
- Outcome
- petitions granted; recusal application refused; debtors adjudicated bankrupt
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication of Bankruptcy, Recusal Application, Service of Process, Statutory Criteria for Bankruptcy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David McLaughlin
Petitioner Creditor
Michael McDaid
Debtor Respondent
Charles McDaid
Debtor Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment on Petition and Recusal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory criteria for adjudication in bankruptcy are met
- 2 Whether there is a basis for recusal of the judge
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory criteria for adjudication in bankruptcy under s. 11(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1988 were satisfied, the debtors failed to show any legally cognisable ground to the contrary, and there was no basis for recusal; therefore, the court was required to adjudicate the debtors bankrupt.
Court Disposition
petitions granted; recusal application refused; debtors adjudicated bankrupt
Orders
- Recusal application refused
- Each debtor adjudicated bankrupt
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment