Bank of Scotland Plc -v- Stapleton [2012] IEHC 549 (29 November 2012)
Evidence as to the arrears on the defendant’s mortgage account must be provided by an officer or partner of the plaintiff bank; evidence from an employee of an outsourced service company is inadmissible hearsay and does not comply with the Bankers’ Books Evidence Acts 1879-1959.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 549
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Bank of Scotland Plc; Defendant/appellant: Julia Stapleton
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court Order for Possession
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Bankers’ Books Evidence Acts, Hearsay, Mortgage Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bank of Scotland Plc
Plaintiff/respondent
Julia Stapleton
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court Order for Possession
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence given by an employee of an outsourced service company (Certus) is admissible to prove arrears on a mortgage account under the Bankers’ Books Evidence Acts 1879-1959
- 2 Whether such evidence constitutes inadmissible hearsay
Ratio Decidendi
Evidence as to the arrears on the defendant’s mortgage account must be provided by an officer or partner of the plaintiff bank; evidence from an employee of an outsourced service company is inadmissible hearsay and does not comply with the Bankers’ Books Evidence Acts 1879-1959.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Circuit Court dated 24th January 2012 for possession vacated
- Plaintiff's entitlement to recover possession set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment