Aer Lingus Group Plc -v Irish Takeover Panel [2013] IEHC 428 (26 July 2013)
The expression 'firm intention to make an offer' in Rule 35.1(a) refers exclusively to an announcement under Rule 2.5. The Ryanair announcement of 29 August 2012 was not a firm intention announcement but a possible offer under Rule 2.4. The Panel's interpretation was correct, and the 12-month moratorium commenced from the date the offer lapsed, 29 August 2012.
- Citation
- [2013] IEHC 428
- Parties
- Applicant: Aer Lingus Group Plc; Respondent: Irish Takeover Panel; Notice Party: Ryanair Holdings PLC; Notice Party: Coinside Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Leave and Substantive Hearing (telescoped)
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Takeover Regulation, Interpretation of Takeover Rules, Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aer Lingus Group Plc
Applicant
Irish Takeover Panel
Respondent
Ryanair Holdings PLC
Notice Party
Coinside Limited
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Leave and Substantive Hearing (telescoped)
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of Rule 35.1(a) of the Takeover Rules regarding the commencement of a 12-month moratorium after a lapsed offer
- 2 Whether the Panel's reading of 'firm intention to make an offer' is correct under the rules
- 3 Application of General Principle 6 from the Takeover Directive
Ratio Decidendi
The expression 'firm intention to make an offer' in Rule 35.1(a) refers exclusively to an announcement under Rule 2.5. The Ryanair announcement of 29 August 2012 was not a firm intention announcement but a possible offer under Rule 2.4. The Panel's interpretation was correct, and the 12-month moratorium commenced from the date the offer lapsed, 29 August 2012.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Leave to challenge the Panel's ruling of 20 May 2013 is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment