Integrated Payment Systems Inc., American Express Travel Related Services/JWT (Forex) Limited. [1999] IECA 565 (27th July, 1999)
The notified Agency and Trust agreement creates a principal-agent relationship, with exclusivity and fee-setting provisions necessary for the operation of the MoneyGram service. The exclusivity and non-compete clauses are limited in scope and duration, do not prevent other providers from entering the market, and do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1999] IECA 565
- Parties
- Notifying Party: Integrated Payment Systems Inc.; Principal: American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc.; Agent: JWT (Forex) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Decision / Certificate Determination
- Outcome
- certificate issued
- Legal Topics
- Agency Agreements, Exclusive Agency, Money Transmission Services, Non Compete Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Integrated Payment Systems Inc.
Notifying Party
American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc.
Principal
JWT (Forex) Limited
Agent
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Decision / Certificate Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Agency and Trust agreement between IPS, American Express, and JWT (Forex) Limited contravenes Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified Agency and Trust agreement creates a principal-agent relationship, with exclusivity and fee-setting provisions necessary for the operation of the MoneyGram service. The exclusivity and non-compete clauses are limited in scope and duration, do not prevent other providers from entering the market, and do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate issued
Orders
- The Agency and Trust agreement dated 19 September 1995 between American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc., Integrated Payment Systems Inc. and JWT (Forex) Limited did not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, as amended up to and including 11 December 1996.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment