Croghan and Ors v Collins and Ors (Approved) [2026] IEHC 22 (15 January 2026)
Costs of interlocutory injunction application awarded against all Plaintiffs jointly and severally, as the application was unstateable and failed; Townbe awarded only 60% of its interlocutory costs due to false information tendered to court; State and Council awarded full interlocutory costs; Ms. Kelly's application for costs refused; costs of moot proceedings not awarded against Townbe or Council, as mootness was not caused by their actions; State's unilateral abandonment of project rendered proceedings moot, but insufficient evidence to award costs against State for mootness.
- Citation
- [2026] IEHC 22
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alan Croghan; Plaintiff: Amanda Farrelly; Plaintiff: Melissa Kelly; Defendant: Paul Collins; Defendant: Tanya Hennigan; Defendant: Townbe Unlimited Company; Defendant: The Commissioner of An Garda Siochana; Defendant: Roderick O'Gorman; Defendant: The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth; Defendant: Dublin City Council; Defendant: The Government of Ireland; Defendant: The Minister for Housing Local Government and Heritage
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Costs Ruling After Proceedings Struck Out as Moot
- Outcome
- Costs awarded against Plaintiffs for interlocutory injunction application; Townbe awarded 60% of interlocutory costs; State and Council awarded full interlocutory costs; no costs awarded for moot proceedings; Ms. Kelly's application for costs refused.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Moot Proceedings, Interlocutory Injunctions, Lay Litigant Costs, Statutory Costs Protection, Conduct and Costs, Impecuniosity and Costs, SLAPP Allegations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Croghan
Plaintiff
Amanda Farrelly
Plaintiff
Melissa Kelly
Plaintiff
Paul Collins
Defendant
Tanya Hennigan
Defendant
Townbe Unlimited Company
Defendant
The Commissioner of An Garda Siochana
Defendant
Roderick O'Gorman
Defendant
The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth
Defendant
Dublin City Council
Defendant
The Government of Ireland
Defendant
The Minister for Housing Local Government and Heritage
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Costs Ruling After Proceedings Struck Out as Moot
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs protection applies to these proceedings
- 2 Entitlement to costs following failed interlocutory injunction application
- 3 Appropriate costs order for lay litigants
Ratio Decidendi
Costs of interlocutory injunction application awarded against all Plaintiffs jointly and severally, as the application was unstateable and failed; Townbe awarded only 60% of its interlocutory costs due to false information tendered to court; State and Council awarded full interlocutory costs; Ms. Kelly's application for costs refused; costs of moot proceedings not awarded against Townbe or Council, as mootness was not caused by their actions; State's unilateral abandonment of project rendered proceedings moot, but insufficient evidence to award costs against State for mootness.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded against Plaintiffs for interlocutory injunction application; Townbe awarded 60% of interlocutory costs; State and Council awarded full interlocutory costs; no costs awarded for moot proceedings; Ms. Kelly's application for costs refused.
Orders
- State Defendants awarded single set of interlocutory costs against Plaintiffs jointly and severally.
- Dublin City Council awarded interlocutory costs against Plaintiffs jointly and severally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment