Maxela Ltd v Companies Act 2014 (Approved) [2025] IEHC 11 (15 January 2025)
The court refused to order a modular trial on the issue of standing because the question of whether the applicant remains a member of the companies is too intertwined with the substantive issues of oppression and the parties' conduct to be determined in isolation. Ordering a modular trial would risk prejudice to the applicant and would not achieve the efficiencies sought.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 11
- Parties
- Applicant: Alexandr Vakiy; Respondent: Max Bulgakov
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Section 212 Oppression Petition Under Companies Act 2014 / Interlocutory Application for Modular Trial
- Outcome
- Application for modular trial refused
- Legal Topics
- Oppression of Minority Shareholders, Standing to Sue, Modular Trial, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexandr Vakiy
Applicant
Max Bulgakov
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 212 Oppression Petition Under Companies Act 2014 / Interlocutory Application for Modular Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has standing to maintain proceedings under section 212 of the Companies Act 2014
- 2 Whether a modular trial should be ordered to determine the issue of standing in isolation
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused to order a modular trial on the issue of standing because the question of whether the applicant remains a member of the companies is too intertwined with the substantive issues of oppression and the parties' conduct to be determined in isolation. Ordering a modular trial would risk prejudice to the applicant and would not achieve the efficiencies sought.
Court Disposition
Application for modular trial refused
Orders
- Refusal of respondent's motion for modular trial dated 31 July 2024
- Matter listed for mention on 28 January 2024 to address costs and further directions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment