Allied Irish Banks Plc & anor -v- Whelan & anor [2015] IEHC 135 (03 February 2015)
Defendants failed to disclose a bona fide defence to the plaintiffs' claims for repayment of the loans. The only arguable defence relates to the alleged misapplication of a €5,000 payment, which is remitted to plenary hearing. The cross-claim for negligent investment advice is independent and does not constitute an equitable set-off, so summary judgment is granted for the loan sums less the disputed €5,000, with a stay on execution for €470,000 pending prosecution of the cross-claim.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 135
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Allied Irish Bank Plc; Plaintiff: AIB Mortgage Bank; Defendant: Patrick Whelan; Defendant: Brian Whelan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Loan Agreements, Equitable Set Off, Cross Claims, Negligent Investment Advice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allied Irish Bank Plc
Plaintiff
AIB Mortgage Bank
Plaintiff
Patrick Whelan
Defendant
Brian Whelan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Judgment on Application for Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment for unpaid loans
- 2 Whether the defendants have disclosed a bona fide defence to the claims
- 3 Whether the defendants' cross-claim for negligent investment advice constitutes an equitable set-off or independent claim
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants failed to disclose a bona fide defence to the plaintiffs' claims for repayment of the loans. The only arguable defence relates to the alleged misapplication of a €5,000 payment, which is remitted to plenary hearing. The cross-claim for negligent investment advice is independent and does not constitute an equitable set-off, so summary judgment is granted for the loan sums less the disputed €5,000, with a stay on execution for €470,000 pending prosecution of the cross-claim.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in part
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiffs against first defendant for €21,255.64 (as of 9 December 2014) less €5,000, with €5,000 remitted to plenary hearing
- Judgment for plaintiffs against both defendants for €2,659,869.75 (as of 9 December 2014), sum to be updated, with a stay on execution for €470,000 for three months pending prosecution of cross-claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment