Allied Irish Bank PLC -v- Counihan & anor [2016] IEHC 752 (21 December 2016)
The court finds that the defendants have raised an arguable defence based on alleged promissory estoppel and potential consumer protection issues, and therefore the matter should proceed to plenary hearing rather than summary judgment.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 752
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Allied Irish Banks PLC; Defendant: Peter Counihan; Defendant: Mary Counihan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Decision on Leave to Defend
- Outcome
- summary judgment refused; matter sent to plenary hearing
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Unfair Contract Terms, Promissory Estoppel, Consumer Credit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allied Irish Banks PLC
Plaintiff
Peter Counihan
Defendant
Mary Counihan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Decision on Leave to Defend
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants are consumers under the Consumer Credit Act 1995 and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1995
- 2 Whether any terms of the loan agreement are unfair and not binding under the Regulations
- 3 Whether promissory estoppel prevents enforcement of the loan agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The court finds that the defendants have raised an arguable defence based on alleged promissory estoppel and potential consumer protection issues, and therefore the matter should proceed to plenary hearing rather than summary judgment.
Court Disposition
summary judgment refused; matter sent to plenary hearing
Orders
- Leave to defend granted; application for summary judgment refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment