Reilly -v- Moir & Ors [2009] IEHC 164 (03 April 2009)
The first defendant negligently performed the surgery, causing permanent disfigurement. No evidence of negligence or vicarious liability against the second defendant, third defendant, or third parties. Plaintiff entitled to damages from first defendant only.
- Citation
- [2009] IEHC 164
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alvin Reilly; First Defendant: Graeme Moir; Second Defendant: Precision Lasercare Limited; Third Defendant: Clane General Hospital; First Third Party: Nigel Carver; Second Third Party: Private Patient Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury/medical Negligence / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff against first defendant
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Damages Assessment, Contractual Relationships
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alvin Reilly
Plaintiff
Graeme Moir
First Defendant
Precision Lasercare Limited
Second Defendant
Clane General Hospital
Third Defendant
Nigel Carver
First Third Party
Private Patient Services Limited
Second Third Party
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/medical Negligence / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the surgery negligently performed?
- 2 Is the first defendant liable for damages?
- 3 Is the second defendant vicariously liable?
Ratio Decidendi
The first defendant negligently performed the surgery, causing permanent disfigurement. No evidence of negligence or vicarious liability against the second defendant, third defendant, or third parties. Plaintiff entitled to damages from first defendant only.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff against first defendant
Orders
- First defendant to pay plaintiff €80142.43 in damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment