Callaghan -v- An Bord Pleanala & ors [2016] IECA 398 (21 December 2016)
The Board's decision under s. 37A(2) to designate a project as strategic infrastructure development is a procedural determination that does not materially or practically affect the rights of third parties in the sense required by constitutional fair procedures. The statutory scheme provides full procedural rights at the substantive planning application stage, and there is no constitutional or statutory obligation to afford third parties a right to be heard before the SID designation. The appeal is dismissed and the certified question is answered in the negative.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 398
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: John Callaghan; Respondent: An Bord Pleanála; Respondents: Ireland and the Attorney General; Notice Party/respondent: Element Power Ireland Limited; Notice Party/respondent: Element Power Ireland; Notice Party/respondent: North Meath Wind Farm Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal Under Planning and Development Act 2000, S. 50 A(7) / Appeal From High Court Decision on Certified Point of Law
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Fair Procedures in Planning Process, Right to Be Heard, Strategic Infrastructure Development, Judicial Review, Procedural Rights of Third Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Callaghan
Applicant/appellant
An Bord Pleanála
Respondent
Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
Element Power Ireland Limited
Notice Party/respondent
Element Power Ireland
Notice Party/respondent
North Meath Wind Farm Limited
Notice Party/respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal Under Planning and Development Act 2000, S. 50 A(7) / Appeal From High Court Decision on Certified Point of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether third party objectors are entitled to be heard before An Bord Pleanála forms an opinion under s. 37A(2) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended)
- 2 Whether the statutory scheme requires or constitutionally obliges such a right to be heard at the SID designation stage
- 3 Whether the Board's SID designation decision materially or practically affects third party rights in the Dellway Investments sense
Ratio Decidendi
The Board's decision under s. 37A(2) to designate a project as strategic infrastructure development is a procedural determination that does not materially or practically affect the rights of third parties in the sense required by constitutional fair procedures. The statutory scheme provides full procedural rights at the substantive planning application stage, and there is no constitutional or statutory obligation to afford third parties a right to be heard before the SID designation. The appeal is dismissed and the certified question is answered in the negative.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Certified question answered in the negative: there is no right for interested members of the public to be heard prior to An Bord Pleanála forming an opinion under s. 37A of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment