An Post/Postmasters [1995] IECA 400 (27th April, 1995)
The Authority found that while An Post and the Postmasters are undertakings and the agreement is between undertakings, the agency agreement does not offend Section 4(1) because Postmasters act as agents (auxiliary organs) of An Post, do not own the goods or services, and none of the agreement's clauses restrict competition.
- Citation
- [1995] IECA 400
- Parties
- Applicant: An Post; Respondent: Postmasters
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Notification for Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- certificate granted
- Legal Topics
- Agency Agreements, Exclusive Dealing, Sub Contracting, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Definition of Undertaking
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
An Post
Applicant
Postmasters
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Notification for Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the standard agency agreement between An Post and Postmasters constitutes an agreement between undertakings under Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- 2 Whether the agreement has as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
Ratio Decidendi
The Authority found that while An Post and the Postmasters are undertakings and the agreement is between undertakings, the agency agreement does not offend Section 4(1) because Postmasters act as agents (auxiliary organs) of An Post, do not own the goods or services, and none of the agreement's clauses restrict competition.
Court Disposition
certificate granted
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the standard agreement between An Post and the Postmasters for the provision of postal and other services in Sub-Post Offices does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment