Martin v. Conroy [2001] IEHC 87; [2002] 1 ILRM 461 (1st May, 2001)

Martin v. Conroy [2001] IEHC 87; [2002] 1 ILRM 461 (1st May, 2001)

The unexplained 7-year delay by the requesting authorities in issuing extradition warrants, together with the inferred real risk of an unfair trial, constitutes exceptional circumstances under Section 50(2)(bbb) of the Extradition Act, 1965, rendering the applicant's extradition unjust. The applicant is entitled to release on this ground, notwithstanding the absence of demonstrated actual prejudice to his defence.

Citation
[2001] IEHC 87
Parties
Plaintiff: Andrew Martin; Defendant: Noel Conroy; Defendant: Michael Jones
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Special Summons (extradition) / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Application granted; applicant to be released.
Legal Topics
Extradition, Delay and Fair Trial Rights, Political Offence Exception, Correspondence of Offences, Judicial Review, Exceptional Circumstances
Criminal Law Extradition Law Constitutional Law Extradition Delay and Fair Trial Rights Political Offence Exception Correspondence of Offences Judicial Review +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 32 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Martin

Plaintiff

Noel Conroy

Defendant

Michael Jones

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Special Summons (extradition) / High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the unexplained delay in issuing extradition warrants renders extradition unjust, oppressive or invidious under Section 50(2)(bbb) of the Extradition Act, 1965
  2. 2 Whether the offences specified in the warrants correspond to offences under Irish law for the purposes of extradition
  3. 3 Whether changes in law or the Good Friday Agreement constitute exceptional circumstances justifying refusal of extradition

Ratio Decidendi

The unexplained 7-year delay by the requesting authorities in issuing extradition warrants, together with the inferred real risk of an unfair trial, constitutes exceptional circumstances under Section 50(2)(bbb) of the Extradition Act, 1965, rendering the applicant's extradition unjust. The applicant is entitled to release on this ground, notwithstanding the absence of demonstrated actual prejudice to his defence.

Court Disposition

Application granted; applicant to be released.

Orders

  • The applicant is to be released pursuant to Section 50(2)(bbb) of the Extradition Act, 1965, due to unjust and oppressive delay in the issuance of extradition warrants.