Stasaitis -v- Noonan Service Group Ltd & Anor [2014] IEHC 199 (11 April 2014)
The Labour Court did not err in law or make unsustainable findings of fact. The arrangements for compensatory rest breaks during periods of inactivity, with access to kitchen and other facilities, satisfied the statutory requirements for equivalence and compensation under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and associated Regulations. The employer was entitled to rely on the exemption for security activities, and the appellant was not deprived of his rights under EU or domestic law.
- Citation
- [2014] IEHC 199
- Parties
- Appellant: Andrius Stasaitis; Respondent: Noonan Services Group Ltd; Notice Party: The Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Working Time, Rest Breaks, Statutory Exemptions, Compensatory Rest, Interpretation of EU Directives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrius Stasaitis
Appellant
Noonan Services Group Ltd
Respondent
The Labour Court
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court erred in law in determining compliance with statutory rest break requirements under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and associated Regulations
- 2 Whether periods of inactivity in a security role constitute compensatory rest breaks under statutory and EU law
- 3 Whether the employer was entitled to rely on statutory exemptions for security activities
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court did not err in law or make unsustainable findings of fact. The arrangements for compensatory rest breaks during periods of inactivity, with access to kitchen and other facilities, satisfied the statutory requirements for equivalence and compensation under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and associated Regulations. The employer was entitled to rely on the exemption for security activities, and the appellant was not deprived of his rights under EU or domestic law.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Labour Court decision affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment