Fitzpatrick -v- Byrne & ors [2016] IEHC 284 (30 May 2016)
The express wording of Order 3, rule 19 precludes the use of special summons to obtain solicitor's files when plenary proceedings are pending; plaintiff must seek access through those proceedings.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 284
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Anthony J. Fitzpatrick; Defendant: Daniel J. Byrne; Defendant: Tara Byrne; Defendant: Daniel J. Byrne Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- relief refused
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Files, Summary Summons, Rules of the Superior Courts, Access to Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Anthony J. Fitzpatrick
Plaintiff
Daniel J. Byrne
Defendant
Tara Byrne
Defendant
Daniel J. Byrne Solicitors
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Special Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a client can obtain solicitor's files by special summons under Order 3, rule 19 when plenary proceedings are pending
Ratio Decidendi
The express wording of Order 3, rule 19 precludes the use of special summons to obtain solicitor's files when plenary proceedings are pending; plaintiff must seek access through those proceedings.
Court Disposition
relief refused
Orders
- Plaintiff not entitled to bring special summons to seek access to solicitor's files; application dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment