Dorcorn Developments Ltd/Manzares Ltd [1993] IECA 47 (5th October, 1993)
The lease agreement, including its restrictive and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State; therefore, it does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 47
- Parties
- Landlord: Dorcorn Developments Ltd; Tenant: Manzares Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- certificate granted
- Legal Topics
- Anti Competitive Agreements, Exclusive User Clauses, Shopping Centre Leases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dorcorn Developments Ltd
Landlord
Manzares Ltd
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease agreement between Dorcorn Developments Ltd and Manzares Ltd contains clauses that prevent, restrict, or distort competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Ratio Decidendi
The lease agreement, including its restrictive and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State; therefore, it does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate granted
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement between Manzares Ltd and Dorcorn Developments Ltd in relation to the lease does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment