Edward & Catherine Drennan/Anthony & Kathryn O'Donovan [1993] IECA 224 (15th December, 1993)
The notified leases and their restrictive user clauses do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State, and therefore do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 224
- Parties
- Lessor: Edward Drennan; Lessor: Catherine Drennan; Lessee: Anthony Finbarr O'Donovan; Lessee: Kathryn O'Donovan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification Decision / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- certificate issued
- Legal Topics
- Anti Competitive Agreements, Shopping Centre Leases, Restrictive Covenants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Drennan
Lessor
Catherine Drennan
Lessor
Anthony Finbarr O'Donovan
Lessee
Kathryn O'Donovan
Lessee
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification Decision / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notified leases and restrictive user clauses offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified leases and their restrictive user clauses do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State, and therefore do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate issued
Orders
- Certificate issued stating the agreements do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment