Timebrock Ltd/Basil Duffy [1993] IECA 110 (13th October, 1993)
The Authority found that the lease and its restrictive and exclusive user clauses do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State, and therefore do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 110
- Parties
- Landlord: Timebrock Ltd; Tenant: Basil Duffy
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Notification
- Outcome
- certificate granted
- Legal Topics
- Anti Competitive Agreements, Shopping Centre Leases, Exclusive User Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timebrock Ltd
Landlord
Basil Duffy
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Notification
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease agreement between Timebrock Ltd and Basil Duffy contains clauses that prevent, restrict, or distort competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
Ratio Decidendi
The Authority found that the lease and its restrictive and exclusive user clauses do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State, and therefore do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate granted
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement between Timebrock Ltd and Basil Duffy in relation to the lease of the mini market unit at Old Bawn Shopping Centre does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment