E & A Gorman/A Elkinson [1994] IECA 341 (14th June, 1994)
The restrictive and exclusive user clauses in the agreement do not prevent, restrict, or distort competition within the State, as the purchaser and others remain free to compete in the relevant markets elsewhere. The sale element was completed before the Act commenced and is not subject to Section 4(1).
- Citation
- [1994] IECA 341
- Parties
- Vendor: Ethel Gorman; Vendor: Ann Gorman; Purchaser: Adrian Elkinson
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification Decision / Decision on Certificate Under Competition Act 1991
- Outcome
- certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1)
- Legal Topics
- Anti Competitive Agreements, Restrictive Covenants, Assignment of Leasehold, Exclusive User Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ethel Gorman
Vendor
Ann Gorman
Vendor
Adrian Elkinson
Purchaser
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification Decision / Decision on Certificate Under Competition Act 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notified agreement contains provisions that offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The restrictive and exclusive user clauses in the agreement do not prevent, restrict, or distort competition within the State, as the purchaser and others remain free to compete in the relevant markets elsewhere. The sale element was completed before the Act commenced and is not subject to Section 4(1).
Court Disposition
certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1)
Orders
- Certificate issued stating the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment