Carroll Products and Designs Ltd /ICC Bank Plc / Subscription and Shareholders Agreement [1997] IECA 485 (6th May, 1997)
The non-solicit and non-compete clauses in the agreements, insofar as their benefit enures to Carroll Products and Designs Ltd, exceed what is necessary to protect the goodwill of the business and restrict competition beyond permissible limits. The waivers executed by ICC and Gokin Ltd do not cure the anti-competitive effect as the benefit of the restrictions remains with Carroll. The agreements therefore offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991 and do not qualify for a certificate or a licence under Section 4(2).
- Citation
- [1997] IECA 485
- Parties
- Notified Party: Carroll Products and Designs Ltd; Notifying Party: ICC Bank plc; Notified Party: Gokin Ltd; Shareholder/warrantor: Frank Carroll; Shareholder/warrantor: Gerard Higgins; Shareholder/warrantor: Aidan Mc Morrow; Shareholder: Kieran Comerford
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification and Request for Certificate or Licence
- Outcome
- Refusal to issue certificate or grant licence
- Legal Topics
- Anti Competitive Agreements, Non Compete Clauses, Non Solicitation Clauses, Venture Capital Investment, Shareholders Agreement, Employment Contract Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carroll Products and Designs Ltd
Notified Party
ICC Bank plc
Notifying Party
Gokin Ltd
Notified Party
Frank Carroll
Shareholder/warrantor
Gerard Higgins
Shareholder/warrantor
Aidan Mc Morrow
Shareholder/warrantor
Kieran Comerford
Shareholder
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification and Request for Certificate or Licence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clauses 6.01(iv), 6.01(v) of the shareholders agreement and clause 14 of the employment agreements offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991
- 2 Whether the agreement qualifies for a certificate or licence under Section 4(4) or 4(2) of the Competition Act 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The non-solicit and non-compete clauses in the agreements, insofar as their benefit enures to Carroll Products and Designs Ltd, exceed what is necessary to protect the goodwill of the business and restrict competition beyond permissible limits. The waivers executed by ICC and Gokin Ltd do not cure the anti-competitive effect as the benefit of the restrictions remains with Carroll. The agreements therefore offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991 and do not qualify for a certificate or a licence under Section 4(2).
Court Disposition
Refusal to issue certificate or grant licence
Orders
- Certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act 1991 refused.
- Licence under Section 4(2) of the Competition Act 1991 refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment