Langan v. O'Dea [1997] IEHC 159 (10th October, 1997)

Langan v. O'Dea [1997] IEHC 159 (10th October, 1997)

The application for release under Section 50(2)(bbb) fails because the lapse of time is attributable to the Applicant's own conduct and no exceptional circumstances have been established to render extradition unjust, oppressive or invidious.

Citation
[1997] IEHC 159
Parties
Applicant: Applicant; Defendant: Defendant
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Extradition Application / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extradition, Lapse of Time, Exceptional Circumstances, Unjust, Oppressive or Invidious Delivery
Criminal Law Extradition Law Extradition Lapse of Time Exceptional Circumstances Unjust, Oppressive or Invidious Delivery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Applicant

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Extradition Application / High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lapse of time and exceptional circumstances make extradition unjust, oppressive or invidious under Section 50(2)(bbb) of the 1965 Act

Ratio Decidendi

The application for release under Section 50(2)(bbb) fails because the lapse of time is attributable to the Applicant's own conduct and no exceptional circumstances have been established to render extradition unjust, oppressive or invidious.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for release under Section 50(2)(bbb) of the 1965 Act is dismissed.