Moore v. Martin [2000] IEHC 119 (29th May, 2000)

Moore v. Martin [2000] IEHC 119 (29th May, 2000)

The application for certiorari is dismissed because the Applicant was afforded natural justice, the evidence was properly admitted, and any error regarding proof of a public place does not appear on the face of the record and is more appropriately addressed by appeal, which is pending.

Citation
[2000] IEHC 119
Parties
Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: First Named Respondent; Respondent: Second Named Respondent
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Certiorari
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Road Traffic Offences, Natural Justice, Judicial Review, Evidence (hearsay and Admissions)
Criminal Law Administrative Law Road Traffic Offences Natural Justice Judicial Review Evidence (hearsay and Admissions)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant

Applicant

First Named Respondent

Respondent

Second Named Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Certiorari

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the District Court failed to consider legal submissions by the Applicant's counsel
  2. 2 Whether hearsay evidence was improperly admitted
  3. 3 Whether there was absence of statutory proof, particularly proof of time and place of driving

Ratio Decidendi

The application for certiorari is dismissed because the Applicant was afforded natural justice, the evidence was properly admitted, and any error regarding proof of a public place does not appear on the face of the record and is more appropriately addressed by appeal, which is pending.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for certiorari is refused