Casey v. Assistant Garda Commissioner [1997] IEHC 67 (19th April, 1997)
The acts alleged in the warrant, if committed in Ireland, would constitute the offence of attempting to obtain money by false pretences under Irish law, as all necessary ingredients of the Irish offence are present in the facts alleged.
- Citation
- [1997] IEHC 67
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons (extradition) / Judgment on Application for Release Under Section 50 of the Extradition Acts, 1965/1994
- Outcome
- Relief refused
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Correspondence of Offences, False Pretences, Attempted Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Plaintiff
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Summons (extradition) / Judgment on Application for Release Under Section 50 of the Extradition Acts, 1965/1994
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the offence alleged in the extradition warrant corresponds to an offence under Irish law
Ratio Decidendi
The acts alleged in the warrant, if committed in Ireland, would constitute the offence of attempting to obtain money by false pretences under Irish law, as all necessary ingredients of the Irish offence are present in the facts alleged.
Court Disposition
Relief refused
Orders
- Application for release under Section 50 of the Extradition Acts, 1965/1994 is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment