P. (P.) v. P. (A.) [1999] IEHC 60 (14th December, 1999)
The Court determined that a substantial lump sum and periodic maintenance were necessary to provide for the Applicant and dependent child, taking into account the Respondent's assets, the need for housing, and the likelihood of reduced maintenance in the future. The Respondent's lack of candour regarding his assets justified a higher award.
- Citation
- [1999] IEHC 60
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Ancillary Relief / Judgment
- Outcome
- Ancillary relief granted
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance, Lump Sum Payment, Pension Adjustment Order, Disclosure of Assets, Succession Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant
Applicant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Ancillary Relief / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of appropriate lump sum and maintenance payments on marital breakdown
- 2 Disclosure and valuation of assets for ancillary relief
- 3 Adjustment of pension rights under Family Law Act, 1995
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that a substantial lump sum and periodic maintenance were necessary to provide for the Applicant and dependent child, taking into account the Respondent's assets, the need for housing, and the likelihood of reduced maintenance in the future. The Respondent's lack of candour regarding his assets justified a higher award.
Court Disposition
Ancillary relief granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay Applicant a lump sum of £425,000, subject to adjustment based on net sale proceeds of family home.
- Respondent to pay Applicant £300 per week for her maintenance and £50 per week for maintenance of the dependent daughter until she attains 23 years of age.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment