Esso Contractor Agreement [1994] IECA 328 (19th May, 1994)
The contractor is a commercial agent of Artane, not an independent trader. The agreement does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition. The post-termination non-compete clause is limited and justified. Therefore, the agreement does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1994] IECA 328
- Parties
- Applicant: Artane Service Station Ltd; Decision Maker: Competition Authority; Related Party: Esso Ireland Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Law Notification/decision / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Commercial Agency, Non Compete Clauses, Distribution Agreements, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Artane Service Station Ltd
Applicant
Competition Authority
Decision Maker
Esso Ireland Ltd
Related Party
Procedural Posture
Competition Law Notification/decision / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the standard contractor agreement between Artane and its contractors constitutes an agreement between undertakings under Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- 2 Whether the agreement has as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
- 3 Whether the contractor is a commercial agent or an independent trader
Ratio Decidendi
The contractor is a commercial agent of Artane, not an independent trader. The agreement does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition. The post-termination non-compete clause is limited and justified. Therefore, the agreement does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the standard agreement between Artane and its contractors for the operation of an Artane-owned petrol station and convenience shop does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment