S (A.) v. H (E.) [1997] IEHC 229 (20th November, 1997)
The child’s habitual residence remained in England at all material times; the Irish Adoption Act, 1952, Section 40(2) does not prevent return under the Hague Convention; evidence does not establish grave risk of serious psychological harm under Article 13; return order is appropriate subject to undertakings.
- Citation
- [1997] IEHC 229
- Parties
- Plaintiff: AS; First Defendant: EH; Second Defendant: MH
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction / Custody / Final Judgment on Hague Convention Claim
- Outcome
- Order for return of child to England under Hague Convention, subject to undertakings.
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Habitual Residence, Hague Convention, Psychological Harm, Custody Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AS
Plaintiff
EH
First Defendant
MH
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction / Custody / Final Judgment on Hague Convention Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the child’s habitual residence was lost upon removal to Ireland
- 2 Whether the Irish Adoption Act, 1952, Section 40(2) prevents return under the Hague Convention
- 3 Whether grave psychological harm would be caused by return under Article 13 of the Hague Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The child’s habitual residence remained in England at all material times; the Irish Adoption Act, 1952, Section 40(2) does not prevent return under the Hague Convention; evidence does not establish grave risk of serious psychological harm under Article 13; return order is appropriate subject to undertakings.
Court Disposition
Order for return of child to England under Hague Convention, subject to undertakings.
Orders
- Return of E to England for custody proceedings.
- Court to consider and approve suitable undertakings regarding child’s welfare upon return.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment