Egan -v- Byrne [2016] IECA 9 (15 January 2016)
Undertakings contained in the terms of settlement annexed to the court's order were not undertakings to the court but inter partes; therefore, breach of such undertakings does not entitle the applicant to attachment and committal.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 9
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Frank Egan as Trustee of the Tubber Water Scheme; Plaintiff/respondent: Tubber Water Limited; Defendant/appellant: Martin Byrne
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Attachment and Committal, Undertakings, Terms of Settlement, Rule of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frank Egan as Trustee of the Tubber Water Scheme
Plaintiff/respondent
Tubber Water Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Martin Byrne
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether undertakings contained in terms of settlement annexed to a court order are undertakings to the court or merely inter partes
- 2 Whether breach of such undertakings entitles the applicant to attachment and committal
Ratio Decidendi
Undertakings contained in the terms of settlement annexed to the court's order were not undertakings to the court but inter partes; therefore, breach of such undertakings does not entitle the applicant to attachment and committal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order for attachment and committal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment