Attorney General -v- Murphy [2007] IEHC 342 (17 October 2007)

Attorney General -v- Murphy [2007] IEHC 342 (17 October 2007)

The respondent's objections did not establish any breach of fundamental rights or statutory prohibition; the extradition request met all legal requirements, and the plea bargaining process was voluntary and not constitutionally impermissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] IEHC 342
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Respondent: Simon Murphy
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
17 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Extradition / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Order for extradition granted
Legal Topics
Extradition to United States, Plea Bargaining, Prison Conditions, Delay in Extradition, Correspondence of Offences
Criminal Law Extradition Law Constitutional Law Extradition to United States Plea Bargaining Prison Conditions Delay in Extradition Correspondence of Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Simon Murphy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extradition / High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Validity of arrest warrant with error
  2. 2 Delay in extradition request
  3. 3 Prison conditions and health risks

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent's objections did not establish any breach of fundamental rights or statutory prohibition; the extradition request met all legal requirements, and the plea bargaining process was voluntary and not constitutionally impermissible.

Court Disposition

Order for extradition granted

Orders

  • Respondent committed to await extradition to the United States of America for sentencing on conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree