A. -v- MJE & Ors [2011] IEHC 381 (12 October 2011)

A. -v- MJE & Ors [2011] IEHC 381 (12 October 2011)

The 2006 Regulations are not deficient in transposing the Qualifications Directive; there is no requirement for a separate appeal against refusal of subsidiary protection unless a unified procedure is used. The principle of equivalence does not require a separate appeal as there is no superior remedy in Irish law for asylum refusals. The deportation order is lawful as the applicant failed to establish any legal deficiency in the subsidiary protection process or any risk of persecution in Sierra Leone.

Citation
[2011] IEHC 381
Parties
Applicant: B. J. S. A.; Respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent: Ireland; Respondent: The Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
12 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Interlocutory Injunction at Leave Stage
Outcome
Application for interlocutory injunction refused
Legal Topics
Subsidiary Protection, Deportation Orders, Effective Remedy, Procedural Fairness, Principle of Equivalence
Immigration Law European Union Law Administrative Law Subsidiary Protection Deportation Orders Effective Remedy Procedural Fairness Principle of Equivalence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B. J. S. A.

Applicant

The Minister for Justice and Equality

Respondent

Ireland

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Interlocutory Injunction at Leave Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 2006 Regulations failed to properly transpose the Qualifications Directive regarding subsidiary protection procedures
  2. 2 Whether the absence of an appeal against refusal of subsidiary protection breaches EU law or the principle of equivalence
  3. 3 Whether the deportation order is unlawful due to alleged deficiencies in the subsidiary protection determination

Ratio Decidendi

The 2006 Regulations are not deficient in transposing the Qualifications Directive; there is no requirement for a separate appeal against refusal of subsidiary protection unless a unified procedure is used. The principle of equivalence does not require a separate appeal as there is no superior remedy in Irish law for asylum refusals. The deportation order is lawful as the applicant failed to establish any legal deficiency in the subsidiary protection process or any risk of persecution in Sierra Leone.

Court Disposition

Application for interlocutory injunction refused

Orders

  • Interlocutory injunction restraining deportation refused