B.R. v P.T. (Approved) [2020] IEHC 205 (21 February 2020)
The appellant failed to prove any relevant change in circumstances or misbehaviour by the respondent that would justify revising the financial provision made at judicial separation. His financial position is the result of his own choices and not attributable to the respondent. Proper provision existed at the time of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 205
- Parties
- Appellant: B. R.; Respondent: P. T.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal (divorce) / High Court Appeal From Circuit Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed with variations.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Judicial Separation, Proper Provision, Maintenance, Custody, Access, Pension Adjustment Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B. R.
Appellant
P. T.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal (divorce) / High Court Appeal From Circuit Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proper provision was made for both parties at the time of judicial separation and whether it should be revised on divorce
- 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to financial relief including maintenance and pension adjustment orders
- 3 Whether access and custody arrangements require variation
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove any relevant change in circumstances or misbehaviour by the respondent that would justify revising the financial provision made at judicial separation. His financial position is the result of his own choices and not attributable to the respondent. Proper provision existed at the time of judicial separation and remains adequate. The appeal is dismissed and the Circuit Court order affirmed with minor variations.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed with variations.
Orders
- Decree of divorce granted.
- Joint custody of dependent children M. and D. affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment