Hyland v. Ireland [1998] IESC 28 (22nd October, 1998)

Hyland v. Ireland [1998] IESC 28 (22nd October, 1998)

The executors did not breach their duties; the factory premises were not part of the deceased's estate at death, as the beneficial interest had passed to the company years earlier. The appellant's complaints were unfounded, and the executors acted honestly and properly in difficult circumstances.

Citation
[1998] IESC 28
Parties
Appellant: Barbara Hyland; Respondent: Michael J. Lucas; Respondent: Paul Butler; Respondent: Brendan Hyland; Respondent (struck Out): Ireland; Respondent (struck Out): The Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Trust, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Misrepresentation, Administration of Estates

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barbara Hyland

Appellant

Michael J. Lucas

Respondent

Paul Butler

Respondent

Brendan Hyland

Respondent

Ireland

Respondent (struck Out)

The Attorney General

Respondent (struck Out)

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the executors breached their duties in the administration of the estate
  2. 2 Whether the factory premises at Sidenham Lane formed part of the deceased's estate
  3. 3 Whether the executors acted negligently or in breach of trust

Ratio Decidendi

The executors did not breach their duties; the factory premises were not part of the deceased's estate at death, as the beneficial interest had passed to the company years earlier. The appellant's complaints were unfounded, and the executors acted honestly and properly in difficult circumstances.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; no interference with High Court findings.