Hyland v. Ireland [1998] IESC 28 (22nd October, 1998)
The executors did not breach their duties; the factory premises were not part of the deceased's estate at death, as the beneficial interest had passed to the company years earlier. The appellant's complaints were unfounded, and the executors acted honestly and properly in difficult circumstances.
- Citation
- [1998] IESC 28
- Parties
- Appellant: Barbara Hyland; Respondent: Michael J. Lucas; Respondent: Paul Butler; Respondent: Brendan Hyland; Respondent (struck Out): Ireland; Respondent (struck Out): The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Misrepresentation, Administration of Estates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barbara Hyland
Appellant
Michael J. Lucas
Respondent
Paul Butler
Respondent
Brendan Hyland
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent (struck Out)
The Attorney General
Respondent (struck Out)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the executors breached their duties in the administration of the estate
- 2 Whether the factory premises at Sidenham Lane formed part of the deceased's estate
- 3 Whether the executors acted negligently or in breach of trust
Ratio Decidendi
The executors did not breach their duties; the factory premises were not part of the deceased's estate at death, as the beneficial interest had passed to the company years earlier. The appellant's complaints were unfounded, and the executors acted honestly and properly in difficult circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no interference with High Court findings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment