Hearn v. Collins [1998] IEHC 187 (3rd February, 1998)

Hearn v. Collins [1998] IEHC 187 (3rd February, 1998)

The Court found that the management agreement was not validly extended by the manuscript agreement or the bout agreement for the relevant period, and that Barry Hearn was not entitled to claim management fees from Stephen Collins for that period. The Court further found that Matchroom Boxing could not enforce the bout agreement on behalf of Barry Hearn. The termination letter of 6th June 1995 was effective to end any contractual relationship. No fundamental breach by Barry Hearn was established that would have entitled Collins to terminate earlier, but the agreements did not cover the period claimed.

Citation
[1998] IEHC 187
Parties
Plaintiff: Barry Hearn; Plaintiff: Matchroom Boxing; Defendant: Stephen Collins
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Management Agreements, Breach of Contract, Termination of Contract, Third Party Enforcement, Conflict of Interest in Sports Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barry Hearn

Plaintiff

Matchroom Boxing

Plaintiff

Stephen Collins

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the management agreement was extended by the manuscript agreement or the bout agreement
  2. 2 Whether the manuscript agreement came into effect or was subject to an unsatisfied pre-condition
  3. 3 Whether the manuscript agreement ceased to have effect when the bout venue changed

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the management agreement was not validly extended by the manuscript agreement or the bout agreement for the relevant period, and that Barry Hearn was not entitled to claim management fees from Stephen Collins for that period. The Court further found that Matchroom Boxing could not enforce the bout agreement on behalf of Barry Hearn. The termination letter of 6th June 1995 was effective to end any contractual relationship. No fundamental breach by Barry Hearn was established that would have entitled Collins to terminate earlier, but the agreements did not cover the period claimed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claims dismissed

Orders

  • No order for account granted
  • No entitlement to management fees for the period claimed