Hearn v. Collins [1998] IEHC 187 (3rd February, 1998)
The Court found that the management agreement was not validly extended by the manuscript agreement or the bout agreement for the relevant period, and that Barry Hearn was not entitled to claim management fees from Stephen Collins for that period. The Court further found that Matchroom Boxing could not enforce the bout agreement on behalf of Barry Hearn. The termination letter of 6th June 1995 was effective to end any contractual relationship. No fundamental breach by Barry Hearn was established that would have entitled Collins to terminate earlier, but the agreements did not cover the period claimed.
- Citation
- [1998] IEHC 187
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Barry Hearn; Plaintiff: Matchroom Boxing; Defendant: Stephen Collins
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Management Agreements, Breach of Contract, Termination of Contract, Third Party Enforcement, Conflict of Interest in Sports Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry Hearn
Plaintiff
Matchroom Boxing
Plaintiff
Stephen Collins
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the management agreement was extended by the manuscript agreement or the bout agreement
- 2 Whether the manuscript agreement came into effect or was subject to an unsatisfied pre-condition
- 3 Whether the manuscript agreement ceased to have effect when the bout venue changed
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the management agreement was not validly extended by the manuscript agreement or the bout agreement for the relevant period, and that Barry Hearn was not entitled to claim management fees from Stephen Collins for that period. The Court further found that Matchroom Boxing could not enforce the bout agreement on behalf of Barry Hearn. The termination letter of 6th June 1995 was effective to end any contractual relationship. No fundamental breach by Barry Hearn was established that would have entitled Collins to terminate earlier, but the agreements did not cover the period claimed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claims dismissed
Orders
- No order for account granted
- No entitlement to management fees for the period claimed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment