Crowley & Anor v Sheehan & Anor (Approved) [2026] IESC 6 (05 February 2026)

Crowley & Anor v Sheehan & Anor (Approved) [2026] IESC 6 (05 February 2026)

The Supreme Court held that the restriction in s. 16(2)(f) of the 1978 Act applies to all leases, not just commercial ones, and that a sub-lessee may only acquire the fee simple if the head lessee is also entitled under Part II of the Act. However, the Court found that the appellant failed to prove that the head lease was non-qualifying, and the absence of a building covenant does not automatically disqualify a lease if other statutory conditions are satisfied. Therefore, the respondents were entitled to acquire the fee simple.

Citation
[2026] IESC 6
Parties
Respondent: Charles Crowley; Respondent: Raymond Crowley; Appellant: Barry Sheehan; Appellant: All Unknown and Unascertained Owner or Owners; Notice Party: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
05 February 2026
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Ground Rents, Acquisition of Fee Simple, Qualifying Lease, Statutory Restrictions, Sub Lessee Rights
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Law Statutory Interpretation Ground Rents Acquisition of Fee Simple Qualifying Lease Statutory Restrictions Sub Lessee Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Crowley

Respondent

Raymond Crowley

Respondent

Barry Sheehan

Appellant

All Unknown and Unascertained Owner or Owners

Appellant

Attorney General

Notice Party

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a sub-lessee can acquire the fee simple where the head lessee does not qualify under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant (Ground Rents) (No. 2) Act 1978
  2. 2 Proper interpretation of s. 16(2)(f) of the 1978 Act—does it apply only to commercial leases or to all leases?
  3. 3 Whether the absence of a building covenant in the head lease renders it non-qualifying for the purposes of the Act

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the restriction in s. 16(2)(f) of the 1978 Act applies to all leases, not just commercial ones, and that a sub-lessee may only acquire the fee simple if the head lessee is also entitled under Part II of the Act. However, the Court found that the appellant failed to prove that the head lease was non-qualifying, and the absence of a building covenant does not automatically disqualify a lease if other statutory conditions are satisfied. Therefore, the respondents were entitled to acquire the fee simple.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Respondents entitled to acquire the fee simple in the premises known as 1B, 'Anneville', Coolgarten Park, Magazine Road, Cork.
  • Purchase price for the fee simple fixed at €1,000, apportioned equally between the head leasehold interest and the superior/freehold interest(s) of unknown owners.