Crowley & anor v Sheehan & ors (Approved) [2026] IESC 16 (18 February 2026)
Due to both parties significantly changing their legal positions at the last minute and the unusual conduct of the appeal, the normal rule that costs follow the event should not apply; therefore, no order for costs is made.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] IESC 16
- Parties
- Respondent: Charles Crowley; Respondent: Raymond Crowley; Appellant: Barry Sheehan; Appellant: All unknown and unascertained owner or owners; Notice Party: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Costs Ruling Following Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Ground Rents, Fee Simple Purchase, Landlord and Tenant Law, Costs Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Crowley
Respondent
Raymond Crowley
Respondent
Barry Sheehan
Appellant
All unknown and unascertained owner or owners
Appellant
Attorney General
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Costs Ruling Following Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should follow the event where both parties changed their legal positions at the final appellate stage
- 2 Interpretation and application of s. 16(2)(f) of the Landlord and Tenant (Ground Rents) (No. 2) Act 1978
Ratio Decidendi
Due to both parties significantly changing their legal positions at the last minute and the unusual conduct of the appeal, the normal rule that costs follow the event should not apply; therefore, no order for costs is made.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- No order for costs in respect of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment