Folan -v- Ó Corraoin & Ors [2011] IEHC 487 (16 November 2011)
The court found that the defendants failed in their duty to provide a safe system of work by not ensuring a ladder was available for safe access to the scaffold, which was a breach of statutory and common law duties. However, the plaintiff was also found contributorily negligent for climbing the scaffold without a ladder and not alerting the foreman or seeking a replacement. The court accepted that the plaintiff suffered a soft tissue injury and some ongoing symptoms, but found that the extent of his incapacity and loss of earnings was exaggerated and not fully attributable to the accident, given his pre-existing conditions and subsequent activities.
- Citation
- [2011] IEHC 487
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bertie (Bartley) Folan; First Named Defendant: Mairtin Ó Corraoin (trading as Mairtin Ó Corraoin Carpentry); Second Named Defendant: Paul Curley; Third Named Defendant: Thomas Curley; Fourth Named Defendant: T. & P. Curley Construction (Galway) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff with reduction for contributory negligence.
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Breach of Statutory Duty, Workplace Safety, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bertie (Bartley) Folan
Plaintiff
Mairtin Ó Corraoin (trading as Mairtin Ó Corraoin Carpentry)
First Named Defendant
Paul Curley
Second Named Defendant
Thomas Curley
Third Named Defendant
T. & P. Curley Construction (Galway) Limited
Fourth Named Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were negligent and in breach of statutory duty regarding workplace safety and provision of safe access (ladder) to scaffolding.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence by climbing scaffolding without a ladder.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff's injuries and losses were caused by the accident or by pre-existing conditions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendants failed in their duty to provide a safe system of work by not ensuring a ladder was available for safe access to the scaffold, which was a breach of statutory and common law duties. However, the plaintiff was also found contributorily negligent for climbing the scaffold without a ladder and not alerting the foreman or seeking a replacement. The court accepted that the plaintiff suffered a soft tissue injury and some ongoing symptoms, but found that the extent of his incapacity and loss of earnings was exaggerated and not fully attributable to the accident, given his pre-existing conditions and subsequent activities.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff with reduction for contributory negligence.
Orders
- Award of damages to the plaintiff reduced by 50% for contributory negligence.
- Defendants to pay the reduced sum to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment